Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 2 de 2
Filter
Add filters








Language
Year range
1.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; 52: e20180272, 2019. tab, graf
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-1041550

ABSTRACT

Abstract INTRODUCTION: Visceral leishmaniasis (VL) is fatal if not diagnosed and treated. This study aimed to estimate the cost-effectiveness of diagnostic-therapeutic alternatives for VL in Brazil. METHODS: A decision model estimated the life expectancy and costs of six diagnostic-therapeutic strategies. RESULTS: IT LEISH + liposomal amphotericin B emerged the best option, presenting lower costs and higher effectiveness. DAT-LPC + liposomal amphotericin B showed an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of US$ 326.31 per life year. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate the feasibility of incorporating DAT and designating liposomal amphotericin B as the first-line drug for VL in Brazil.


Subject(s)
Humans , Amphotericin B/economics , Cost-Benefit Analysis/statistics & numerical data , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/economics , Meglumine/economics , Antiprotozoal Agents/economics , Brazil , Coombs Test/economics , Amphotericin B/administration & dosage , Sensitivity and Specificity , Fluorescent Antibody Technique, Indirect/economics , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/diagnosis , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/drug therapy , Meglumine/administration & dosage , Antiprotozoal Agents/administration & dosage
2.
Rev. Soc. Bras. Med. Trop ; 50(4): 478-482, July-Aug. 2017. tab
Article in English | LILACS | ID: biblio-896990

ABSTRACT

Abstract INTRODUCTION: The drugs available for visceral leishmaniasis (VL) treatment in Brazil have specific characteristics in terms of operability, effectiveness, toxicity, and cost. The aim of this study was to estimate the direct costs of therapies recommended by the Ministry of Health (MH) for VL treatment in Brazil. METHODS: The analytical perspective used was that adopted by the Brazilian Public Health System. Three drugs and four regimens were included: 1) N-methyl glucamine antimoniate intramuscularly at 20mg per kg per day for 30 days; 2) N-methyl glucamine antimoniate intravenously at 20mg per kg per day for 30 days; 3) amphotericin B deoxycholate at 1mg per kg per day for 21 days; and 4) liposomal amphotericin B at 3mg per kg per day for a 7 days treatment. RESULTS: The estimated direct costs of treatment for an adult patient using N-methylglucamine antimoniate administered via the intramuscular and intravenous routes were USD 418.52 and USD 669.40, respectively. The estimated cost of treatment with amphotericin B deoxycholate was USD 1,522.70. Finally, the estimated costs of treatment with liposomal amphotericin B were USD 659.79, and USD 11,559.15 using the price adopted by the WHO and the Drug Regulation Board, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This analysis indicates the economic feasibility of replacing N-methyl glucamine antimoniate with liposomal amphotericin B, which allows a shorter treatment period with less toxicity compared with other treatments, provided that the purchase value used by the WHO and transferred to the MH is maintained.


Subject(s)
Humans , Health Care Costs/statistics & numerical data , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/drug therapy , Antiprotozoal Agents/economics , Organometallic Compounds/economics , Organometallic Compounds/therapeutic use , Brazil , Amphotericin B/economics , Amphotericin B/therapeutic use , Clinical Protocols , Deoxycholic Acid/economics , Deoxycholic Acid/therapeutic use , Drug Combinations , Meglumine Antimoniate , Leishmaniasis, Visceral/economics , Meglumine/economics , Meglumine/therapeutic use , Antiprotozoal Agents/therapeutic use
SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL